Saturday Evening Judicial Reiew Post #17
Saturday, July 30th, 2005For our Judicial Review today, we want to revisit Roe v. Wade in relation to the confirmation of Judge John Roberts to the United States Supreme Court.
Ed Whelan, President of Ethics and Public Policy Center and contributer to Bench Memos has written the most lucid explanation of three possible positions on Roe v. Wade which we have found as of this date in, Abortion & Justice. For our purposes today, we are going to outline Mr. Whelan’s three positions, set forth his observations, and finish with our conclusions.
Here are Mr. Whelan’s three positions:
- “The pro-abortion position. The first position is that the Constitution prohibits, to one degree or another, laws that protect the life of an unborn human being against her mother’s desire to have her killed.
- The pro-life position. A second position is that the (Read the rest of the story below the fold...)
Tags: Supreme Court, Roe v. Wade, Judicial Activism, Pro Life, Pro Abortion




