Leon H at Red State has written some of the best reasoning against abortion I have ever read in his article, Abortion By the Numbers. He begins by quoting Joseph Stalin, and Jesse Jackson from 1977. Here’s a taste:

“A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic.” -Josef Stalin

“That is why the Constitution called us three-fifths human and then whites further dehumanized us by calling us ‘n*****s’. It was part of the dehumanizing process. The first step was to distort the image of us as human beings in order to justify that which they wanted to do and not even feel like they had done anything wrong. Those advocates of taking life prior to birth do not call it killing or murder, they call it abortion. They further never talk about aborting a baby because that would imply something human. Rather they talk about aborting the fetus. Fetus sounds less than human and therefore abortion can be justified…

* * *

Abortion is black genocide. What happens to the mind of a person and the moral fabric of a nation that accepts the aborting of the life of a baby without a pang of conscience?”

Go read the rest!

What you are about to read is the consequense of a society that has lost it’s way in morality and ethics.

We are encouraged by the Main Stream Media that we need to be more enlightened in determining our behavior in our society. We are told that we need to emulate the great European cultures of France and Germany, and to not be so concerned with morality and ethics as a people. The enlightened societies of the world have a tendency to look at the United States as being intolerant and socially behind the times because of our Judeo-Christian heritage.

CNN has a story today, Specialist: Keeping fetuses may be widespread, which illustrates just how enlightened society in France has become. Here is a segment:

“Investigators probing the shocking discovery of hundreds of fetuses and stillborn babies stored in a Paris hospital morgue are likely (Read the rest of the story below the fold...)

For our Judicial Review today, we want to revisit Roe v. Wade in relation to the confirmation of Judge John Roberts to the United States Supreme Court.

Ed Whelan, President of Ethics and Public Policy Center and contributer to Bench Memos has written the most lucid explanation of three possible positions on Roe v. Wade which we have found as of this date in, Abortion & Justice. For our purposes today, we are going to outline Mr. Whelan’s three positions, set forth his observations, and finish with our conclusions.
Here are Mr. Whelan’s three positions:

1. “The pro-abortion position. The first position is that the Constitution prohibits, to one degree or another, laws that protect the life of an unborn human being against her mother’s desire to have her killed.
2. The pro-life position. A second position is that the (Read the rest of the story below the fold...)